"For these reasons we have strong objections to the introduction of maps and their circulation among our people which profess to give the location of the Nephite cities and settlements"
There is a tendency, strongly manifested . . . among some of the brethren, to study the geography of the Book of Mormon. . . . We are greatly pleased to notice the . . . interest taken by the Saints in this holy book. . . . But valuable as is the Book of Mormon both in doctrine and history, yet it is possible to put this sacred volume to uses for which it was never intended, uses which are detrimental rather than advantageous to the cause of truth, and consequently to the work of the Lord. . . . The brethren who lecture on the lands of the Nephites or the geography of the Book of Mormon are not united in their conclusions. ... The First Presidency has often been asked to prepare some suggestive map illustrative of Nephite geography, but have never consented to do so. ...
[George Q. Cannon, "Editorial Thoughts: The Book of Mormon Geography," The Juvenile Instructor 25 no. 1 (1 January 1890)), 18-19]
Disagreement #1: Did the Jaredites cross the Atlantic or the Pacific? (the Lehi-Nephi migration and the Zarahemla-Mulek migration crossed the Pacific for sure and for certain).
ReplyDeleteDisagreement #2: Was the hill Cumorah in New York State or in Central America?
There is a feeling among many that that perfect knowledge will only be revealed someday to the Indigenous-Aboriginal Americans.
ReplyDelete